<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breeze Through with FlyBags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matadornetwork.com/goods/breeze-through-with-flybags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matadornetwork.com/goods/breeze-through-with-flybags/</link>
	<description>travel culture worldwide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HazardousDavis</title>
		<link>http://matadornetwork.com/goods/breeze-through-with-flybags/#comment-64366</link>
		<dc:creator>HazardousDavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matadorgoods.com/?p=191#comment-64366</guid>
		<description>Haha, how much did they pay you to review their product then?  Granted, having one of these bags may prove to reduce time, but the time gained from it achieves what?  A little longer in the departure gate, or more time to re-pack your wash-bag that set off the search-alarm?     Having my liquids taken off me very recently at Bangkok airport will undoubtedly make this a biased response, however, I think there are some interesting things to point out about towards the above ...    The FlyBag is capitalising on our misfortune and to some extent our (uncompromisable) control. You could say &#039;Well done&#039; on the fact that someone&#039;s making money off of this idea, but you can also say that isn&#039;t the &#039;FlyBag&#039; just another gutless submission to a set of laws in place that really don&#039;t need to be there?    For those of you who have looked in to the majorly flawed sector of airport &#039;Security&#039;, you will hopefully have concluded yourself that such a set of rules being put in place is not really an effort towards increasing &#039;Security&#039; but one to increase control upon the average person.   What really results when they say you can&#039;t take these small substances on board with you? Well, more often than not, you will end up having to buy more make-up on the other side, or a bottle of water once you get through the checks. In all, you spend more money, the situation eludes you to believe you are wasting valuable time (and in such a &#039;pressured&#039; atmosphere as an airport, this is effective on most people) and so in order to never go through such an ordeal ever again, you don&#039;t address the ridiculous set of rules on the chin, but instead, take the easy route, buy the smaller amounts etc, or even better, get yourself a fashionable &#039;fly Bag&#039; in a grey that matches the colour of your slowly-sedated sense of acceptance.    Not really a Rant, but I think as travelers, NOT asking ourselves the questions of the underlying matters in situations like these, is only going to see our priceless travel experiences become more and more diluted as we are forced, ever so slowly, to take the food off of the spoon, with products such as these...          </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, how much did they pay you to review their product then?  Granted, having one of these bags may prove to reduce time, but the time gained from it achieves what?  A little longer in the departure gate, or more time to re-pack your wash-bag that set off the search-alarm?     Having my liquids taken off me very recently at Bangkok airport will undoubtedly make this a biased response, however, I think there are some interesting things to point out about towards the above &#8230;    The FlyBag is capitalising on our misfortune and to some extent our (uncompromisable) control. You could say &#039;Well done&#039; on the fact that someone&#039;s making money off of this idea, but you can also say that isn&#039;t the &#039;FlyBag&#039; just another gutless submission to a set of laws in place that really don&#039;t need to be there?    For those of you who have looked in to the majorly flawed sector of airport &#039;Security&#039;, you will hopefully have concluded yourself that such a set of rules being put in place is not really an effort towards increasing &#039;Security&#039; but one to increase control upon the average person.   What really results when they say you can&#039;t take these small substances on board with you? Well, more often than not, you will end up having to buy more make-up on the other side, or a bottle of water once you get through the checks. In all, you spend more money, the situation eludes you to believe you are wasting valuable time (and in such a &#039;pressured&#039; atmosphere as an airport, this is effective on most people) and so in order to never go through such an ordeal ever again, you don&#039;t address the ridiculous set of rules on the chin, but instead, take the easy route, buy the smaller amounts etc, or even better, get yourself a fashionable &#039;fly Bag&#039; in a grey that matches the colour of your slowly-sedated sense of acceptance.    Not really a Rant, but I think as travelers, NOT asking ourselves the questions of the underlying matters in situations like these, is only going to see our priceless travel experiences become more and more diluted as we are forced, ever so slowly, to take the food off of the spoon, with products such as these&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

