Photo by Roldan Smith

It’s that time of decade again when more than 120 million US citizens will check their mailbox to find those fun census forms waiting to be filled out.

The whole world is big on census taking. New Zealand, Canada and Australia conduct censuses every 5 years, and the UK every 10 years.

Some people are put off by the practice. Discovering that envelope marked “YOUR RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW” is a little intimidating. After all, failure to provide the necessary information could result in jail time in the USA. That’s a big deal just for someone who doesn’t want their privacy invaded. Is this violating freedom of choice?

Privacy concerns

The official census website says your private information is never published, like names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and telephone numbers. The Census Bureau also cannot release this information to other federal agencies, such as law enforcement.

Photo by willhowells

In 72 years, however, the information is made public. You probably won’t be around to care, but at some point people are going to know where you were and who you were living with in 2010. This timeframe varies: in Canada, private information isn’t released until 92 years are up.

Is the census worth it?

Among many uses for the population count, the Bureau needs to know how to divvy up more than $400-billion in federal funding to be used for hospitals, job training centers, senior centers, emergency services and more.

In the past, some states like Alabama and New York with higher populations of low-income families had low participation rates. This means that it is likely some areas in need didn’t get the money they deserved. Would more inclusive involvement cause the money to be spread more evenly?

Also, these campaigns are costing an arm and a leg. In the US, $6.5 billion helps allow politicians to push all those lovely, guilt-inspiring televisions ads. There’s also an online map to track participation rates.

But this year the Census Bureau has devoted a lot of time and effort into stressing the importance of returning the information. For example, for the first time ever, a bilingual (English-Spanish) questionnaire is being handed out.

Also, those leading nomadic lifestyles are being counted in: the Bureau has hired some shamelessly persistent census ninjas. Chris Dunphy and Cherie Ve Ard of Technomadia were tracked down while on the road, despite having no fixed address. While a census taker showing up at an RV door is surprising, it’s really a good thing that nomads could potentially benefit from the extra effort. There’s even a Transitory Location Questionnaire specifically for people on the move.

What do you think? Could the census results potentially bring positive changes to the places that need it, or is it a total waste of time and an invasion of privacy?

Do you feel a national census is a violation of freedom of choice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Activism + Politics
 

About The Author

Candice Walsh

Candice is a travel writer and blogger currently stationed in St. John’s, Newfoundland. When she’s not shooting whiskey and hitting on men, she’s eating nachos and dreaming about her next big adventure. Check out her blog, Candice Does the World.

  • Ana

    If the information obtain in past censuses hadn’t been made available, many people would not know who their ancestors were, where they lived, etc. Why is it such a big deal to answer the census’ questions? Your bank, your cable company, your phone company, etc, etc have more personal information about you than the government anyway.

  • Jeffrey

    Well, I have to say I don’t like the poll options. Yes or no would be fine, I hate when people put words in your mouth about the reasoning. Some of the questions are not necessary but I think a count and some general information: ages, if they attend school, names are fine but they do not need to know who owns the house or anything abou the mortgage or income etc. Even if I or others don’t mind answering, it does not make the questions encessary. But I do believe some are.

    And also, “Freedom of Choice” is guarenteed under Federal Law, plus it is way to broad to be in law…choice of anything? including choice to follow law? SO it does not violate and “freedoms” as American holds them.

    An interesting question, good post.

  • Jeffrey

    Correction: I meant to say freedom of choice is NOT guarenteed in law

  • http://www.tourfolio.com Bryan @ Tourfolio.com

    I could really care less considering this information – the questions asked in the Census – are out there, in some way or another.

    As you mentioned, without it, we would be a bit screwed when it comes to dividing federal money as well as assigning the number of representatives in a district/state.

  • Candice Walsh

    Thanks for the input, guys. Jeffrey, you’re right, something I didn’t really consider when putting together the poll, but thanks for your input!

  • http://matadortravel.com/travel-community/valodniece Antra

    As a genealogist, I take a more historical perspective rather than a here-and-now purpose for the census. I consider census records to be important snapshots of a country’s society throughout time. Our ancestors were kind enough to fill out their census forms so we could learn about them. Can’t we do the same courtesy for our descendants?

    I just don’t understand why people object to the census so much, particularly if they get the short form questionnaires (though apparently in this census, the US doesn’t even have long form census forms anymore. I’m Canadian, and last I checked, we’re still intending on having them in 2011). People provide more information on their Facebook profiles, and that information could at any time be sold to the highest bidder.

  • http://www.tourfolio.com Bryan @ Tourfolio.com

    Re-reading this, I felt like what I said could come across as ‘harsh’, but I meant “I really could care less” more in reference to caring about the Census questions rather then your poll.

    Sorry Candice if you took it that way!

    • http://www.candicedoestheworld.com Candice

      Hehe, don’t worry Bryan, I didn’t really take it that way. And also, I expect some buttons to be pushed when it comes to politics. ;)

  • LibrariNerd

    The Census form doesn’t ask for your SSN or your phone number.

    • Candice Walsh

      Oh well, I guess that’s why they don’t publish it then!

  • http://milesofabbie.com Abbie

    I don’t see the big deal about filling out the census, it took 2 seconds. I think the worst part of it is the waste of money for advertising – I received a letter before the census arrived, a letter after, seen billboards, and seen TV commercials…

    • http://www.kaleidoscopicwandering.com JoAnna

      I agree with Abbie. There really isn’t any thing major on the census form – it was surprisingly short. If everyone would just fill it out and be done with it, they’d save a ton of money on pre- and post-census advertising.

  • http://www.idealistcafe.com/blog/ Russ

    I always have mixed feelings on this sort of thing, but I’ve gotta say, what’s the big deal? The government already knows our most vital info, including SSN, so what’s the concern as far as the census goes? Not to mention that we all probably have more personal information on our Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, blogs, etc than we’ll put on the census form. I guess what makes it different is that in this case it’s mandatory, sort of a Big Brother saying “Do it or else!” which always makes us a little uneasy.

    • Candice Walsh

      Yes, the “Big Brother” reference came up several times in the articles I read. I personally have no problems with filling it out, but the penalties? Yeeeesh. Harsh.

  • heather

    As someone who collects stats for a nonprofit, I can appreciate how hard and frustrating it is to get an accurate count of things you really want to know. Then add in all the political perspectives on undercounting vs. overcounting to the expensive and inaccurate nightmare. I understand it’s the law to take a full-population census every 10 years, but population sampling can be much more accurate for determining some of these “high stakes” things.

    However, I dutifully filled out my census (but ignored a second one sent to me when I moved to a new apartment). I did think it was really dumb that they said it’s required by law. It’s really not and by lying to people on that, they undermine legitimacy in other areas, potentially giving people more reason to fall for whatever census conspiracy theories are floating around at the time.

  • http://www.thefutureisred.typepad.com/ Leigh Shulman

    It’s most definitely the penalties imposed if you don’t fill it out that bother me. Also, Facebook, Twitter, all that, I choose what I want put out in the world. On the census, I do not have a choice.

    And while I realize freedom, as you say Jeffrey, freedom of choice is not guaranteed, this sort of thing only reminds me of that. Particularly when we proclaim at baseball games and recite in classrooms all over the country that the United States is “Home of the free and the brave.”

    I guess I should have read the fine print on that, too.

Artist Profiles →

Zefrey Throwell orchestrated mass nudity outside the NYSE. What was he getting at?

Activism + Politics →

At least 300,000 people took part in the largest rally in Israel's history.

Activism + Politics →

"I went into the bank and took out $20,000 in credit card cash advances to fund the...

Free the Hikers →

On the eve of their trial in Iran, supporters of Shane and Josh gather to demand their...

Activism + Politics →

Hungary does not permit genetically modified crops, even Monsanto's.

Activism + Politics →

The local operator for the company hired 32 community members to clean up the mess. With...

Activism + Politics →

/“If you undermine trust in our system, you undermine everything."