Since the 1980s, the US has been waging its ‘War on Drugs’ in earnest. Here’s how we’re doing.

The War on Drugs

To add this infographic to your site, use the following embed code:



Drug Laws

 

About The Author

Hal Amen

Hal Amen is a managing editor for Matador. His personal travel blog is at WayWorded.

  • Michelle Schusterman

    This is fantastic. (The infographic. The information itself is alarming.)

  • Jwoolsey

    The most telling stat for me here is that Big Pharma spends more money on marketing than it does on research and development… why should we trust pharmaceuticals have our best interest in mind when it appears their major interest is selling us their product?

  • http://abbiemood.com/ Abbie

    This infographic is amazing. And agree with Michelle that the info. is alarming.

  • Korky Jan

    In Europe advertisement of over the counter medicine is allowed.

  • Bobpatterson3

    US is spending that much on NASA?

  • Anonymous

    Whats missing is the US helps grow the opium then takes the opium and
    brings it into the USA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj-b3pB6M7s . The
    Us banks help launder the drug money.
    http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/06/report-wachovia-bank-helped-launder-mexican-drug-money/1 
    Then the feds set up Fast and furious as a way to demonize the second amendment. The Agents gave the guns to the cartels. http://www.infowars.com/confirmed-atf-plotted-to-use-fast-and-furious-to-demonize-second-amendment/

  • Graham

    Great information! There’s no such thing as a bad drug, simply bad relationships to drugs… in my opinion.

  • http://tinyurl.com/affiliate-ressurection Janet Johnson

    An absurdly thorough reader might be able to converge by systematically sorting out the excesses, misunderstandings, distortions and contradictions voiced and then connecting the dots… But it might be easier to take a glance at the bytes that have have already flowed under this bridge from day one. I’m not anti-War on Drugs…but I couldn’t eat a whole one. I feel that the human race will not survive in the form of civilization as we know it much longer.

  • Muirheadm

    ‎”We” are losing the war on drugs because the conscious intention in beginning it was for it never to be won.

    It’s not a war: it’s a social engineering tool that’s been in use for
    so long by so many powerful people – and has spread so widely – that
    it’s become part of our whole global culture and in its own right an
    important part of the world’s economy.

  • http://twitter.com/#!/david_frankk David Frankk

    I hate to say this but, from what I can infer from this Infographic it seems like a better option to just legalize drugs

    Java Software Development

    • Michelle Schusterman

       That’s one option. Another is to not make drugs the #1 priority for the police, over homicides, kidnappings, rapes, and burglaries. In the 70s when Portugal experienced an increase in drug use, its government took the money they could have spent building prisons and doing “drug busts,” and instead put it into creating drug rehabilitation and awareness programs. A decade later they reported a dramatic decrease in drug use. And rather than having an enormous percentage of their population sitting in cells, they’re out working and contributing to society. The War on Drugs was ridiculous from the get-go.

      • http://twitter.com/#!/david_frankk David Frankk

         Nicely put Michelle. Instead of fighting it all the time the govt needs to tackle this issue in a different way. Something like what the Portuguese did in their country. Also, I still wouldn’t totally rule out the first option. Its easily available anyway, might as well make it legal.

        Mobile Application Development

        • Michelle Schusterman

           I completely agree. In the 80s when this “war” was launched, the number of deaths in the US related to any and all types of illegal drugs was only a fraction of the number of deaths caused by drunk driving. Interesting to note that the War on Drugs started from the top – the Reagan administration – and addressed a problem the country wasn’t really having (crack didn’t appear in the US until two years after the “war” was launched). But the movement against drunk driving was truly grassroots, started because people saw there was a legitimate problem that needed addressing – deaths due to drunk drivers.

          Also notable – it wasn’t a movement for prohibition. Just awareness and fair punishment for driving while intoxicated. Stark difference between a movement started by the people and a movement started by politicians with entirely different interests.

Drug Laws →

If heroin became legal today, would you run out the door to score your first hit?

Drug Laws →

More evidence that treatment beats incarceration when it comes to drug crimes.

Drug Laws →

Nutt famously stated that "the dangers of Ecstasy are no greater than those of...

Drug Laws →

Deep in a remote Cambodian rainforest, criminals are setting up illegal factories to...

Video + Vlogs →

Joshywashington and his grandpa Ben visit Yosemite, hike to the Nevada waterfall, chat...

World Events →

Matador weighs the evidence and decides: Only if your plans include Spring Break in...

Drug Laws →

Let's stop for a second and look at this purely by the numbers.

Drug Laws →

From Australia to Macedonia, here's the breakdown of where smoking is accepted, and where...

Drug Laws →

Rick Steves takes on the backwards pot laws in a new interview.