David Miller identifies and examines 14 common ways that people look at place.

Photo: eonaxon

TWO SEMI-STRANGE things in the last couple days have occasioned me to think more about place than usual:

A. On a call with a group of travel marketing people, an executive said “position place” as in “there are ways we like to ‘position’ place” [doggy-style?]

B. One of my favorite writers posted a bizarre blog post that talked about a country music song and how the lyrics would lead you to think that the guy singing was from “the country, ” but then after researching the singer’s hometown (and posting statistics about education, jobs, median income there), his conclusion was “I’m way more hick than he is.”

Using these two examples (as well as several others that will follow), I’d like to examine some of the common ways people seem to look at place. It should be noted that I don’t look these ways in the context of “right or wrong” but more as reflections of people’s relationships with place that exist in certain points in time. I don’t think anyone looks at place in one of the forms below exclusively, but as a constantly changing and evolving mix.

14 WAYS OF LOOKING AT PLACE

We’ll begin with two main ways of looking at place, mythologizing and commodifying, and from there look at other ways, most of which are combinations of these two.

Mythologizing

Mythologizing place is looking at place as an abstraction. People mythologize place by (a) assigning some kind of abstraction [ex: virtue, nostalgia, chivalrousness, level of 'hickness' ] to it, or similarly (b) assigning some kind of abstraction or quality to themselves because of it (This is what the writer in example B above was doing).

Ex: “The South taught me how to be a gentleman.”

No, your parents did.

Mythologizing is the act of creating illusions about place. These illusions “exist” within the discrepancy between the concrete reality a person experiences in a place (examples: how long he/she has lived there, where he/she lives–downtown, suburbs, outlying areas, his/her role in the local economy, his/her community / friends) versus the “image” he or she has of the place.

Mythologizing often happens when people look back at where they grew up, or lived, or once traveled, and feel certain emotions that didn’t exist when they actually lived or traveled there.

Ex: “I’ve never been in a hotter place than a soccer field in North Georgia in the summer.”

No, actually it was much hotter when you were in Ecuador.

Commodifying [fundamental]

Commodifying (on a fundamental level) is reducing place into a singular context of resources in concrete reality. Examples would be looking at forests as “timber to be harvested” or rivers as “hydroelectric potential.”

Commodifying [common]

There exists however a much subtler and more pervasive form of commodifying where instead of concrete reality, the context of “resources” includes abstractions, associations, “appeal,” or “image.” This is how the marketing lady in the call above was looking at place–as an image which needed to be packaged a certain way, transformed into a product to be “positioned” in the market.

Most people seem to engage in this form of commodifying without ever thinking about it. For example, when I lived in Seattle, oftentimes I told people more or less “Seattle is good because you have easy access to the mountains.”

Here’s another example:

In one of Lola Akinmade’s blogs, a woman said: “I’ve just been back from The Gambia. . .Desperately poor country. Desperate. . .But they’ve got 500 species of birds!”

One of my bros once described San Francisco as having “culture and surf.”

This all reflects how people tend to reduce place into a few resources which may not even be resources in concrete reality, and then evaluate place within this context.

As terrain

This way of looking at place is a specialized form of commodifying that’s prevalent among surfers, mountaineers, kayakers, snowboarders, and other people who “live for” exploring place. The world may be seen in the context of “terrain” to be ascended, descended, surfed.

As “Inspiration”

This ties in both with mythologizing and commodifying: Some people may look at place within the context of inspiration. These are often writers, photographers, poets, filmmakers, artists, and others who travel or move to places because they have a positive effect on their work.

As “Escape”

This is similar to “inspiration”: Some people look at place as a potential “escape” from whatever they are experiencing “at home.”

Read full article on MatadorU

Community Connection

What other ways do people look at place?
How has your ways of looking at place evolved / changed over time?

Narrative
 

About The Author

David Miller

David Miller is senior editor of Matador (winner of 2010 and 2011 Lowell Thomas awards for travel journalism), and BETA magazine. After living for the last two years in Patagonia, Argentina, he is returning with his wife and two young children to the Southern US. Follow him @dahveed_miller.

  • http://www.travelmuse.com Jessica Skelton

    Amazing post. Well written and incredibly insightful. If more travelers could realize the many different ways we perceive place (or a number of things for that matter), maybe more people would appreciate travel on a whole new level.

    • http://matadortravel.com/travel-community/david-miller David Miller

      thanks jessica.

      i feel like ppl’s relationship with place is kind of the ‘great overlooked / unspoken’ of growing up in the modern or (postmodern) world.

      everything used to be based on place. identity. food. culture. language (dialect). everything.

      i feel like we’ve evolved from of these old structures faster (maybe) than our ability our emotional development for ‘dealing with it.’

      not sure.

      at the very least it seems worth questioning.

  • http://cuadernoinedito.wordpress.com Julie

    Thanks for this, David. I’m constantly thinking about representations of place; it’s a persistent obsession of mine on Cuaderno Inedito. As you said, I don’t necessarily think any of these ways of seeing (and, perhaps even more importantly, narrating) are right or wrong, though I have my own preferences, and those tend toward constantly “re-seeing” a place- contesting whatever my initial assumptions and observations are, looking for the backstories, the under stories, the untold stories, and–especially–the story that isn’t being told, the one that isn’t easily or initially visible.

    • http://matadortravel.com/travel-community/david-miller David Miller

      thanks for the comment julie.

      what are the things you look for when uncovering the stories that aren’t being told?

      • http://collazoprojects.com Julie

        DM-

        Glad you asked me, because this “other” way of seeing had become second nature, so I hadn’t quite thought about how I’d articulate it. There are lots of ways to approach looking for and listening to “alternate” narratives, but one of the main ways is by determining who’s doing all the talking (or who occupies the positions of privilege), and then figuring out who is left out of the dominant discourse. Usually, though not always, that group includes poorer people, people of color, women, and anyone who occupies a “minority” status. That’s just one way–think I’ve got to get around, eventually, to writing a whole piece about this.

        • http://matadortravel.com/travel-community/david-miller David Miller

          thanks for sharing this julie.

          would love to hear more / see a piece about this.

  • http://matadortrips.com/ Hal Amen

    The opposite of “as terrain” would be “as its people.”

    “xxx is hipster-ville.”
    “There are way too many hicks in xxx.”
    “xxx is a haven for artistic types.”

    Of course, that requires first “mythologizing” (or reducing/stereotyping) a large group of people, and then the place where they live by association.

    • http://matadortravel.com/travel-community/david-miller David Miller

      nice hal.

      that’s another way for sure.

  • http://www.americandetour.com Bruce Northam

    Wonderful article, particularly enjoyed the realization of the last section.

    • http://matadortravel.com/travel-community/david-miller David Miller

      appreciate that bruce.

  • http://vagabonderz.com Carlo

    Nice David. I was going to say “guilty” on some (or all) of these counts…but as you say, I don’t think it’s neither right nor wrong, just something we do. Being in NYC now for over two months, I definitely define different areas based on these (Williamsburg in Brooklyn is full of artists). And I’m sure when I leave I’ll be doing a lot of mythologizing.

  • http://www.nileguide.com/destination/dublin Vourneen

    Fascinating subject which you managed to convey excellently. My personal experience of place is transitional to say the least. I have clocked up perhaps 30-40 different abodes in 4 different countries in my lifetime. I have never lived in one place longer than 3-4 years. Place to me is secondary to my experiences in them. I have had brief flings rather than relationships with most.

    Sometimes this can be quite troublesome. For instance answering simple questions can become problematic such as ‘where are you from?’. Othertimes it can keep my mind open as I understand that a place can be anything you want to perceive it to be, a home to me, is a holiday for my neighbour, a marketable destination for my boss or a source of income for a migrant worker. A place is not just one thing it is fluid with time.

  • http://www.Travel-Writers-Exchange.com Travel-Writers-Exchange.com

    Great lesson on place! This is so true, “…It seems like all of the ways of looking at place above imply a disconnection with place. We “look at” place “in terms of” different things–abstractions, commodities–when there’s a layer separating us from being fully “there.”" How you look at place is very personal and usually based on your experiences. You may think a place is different or will be different, but if you haven’t grown and evolved you won’t be able to see the differences and similarities.

  • http://www.hereishavana.wordpress.com Connergo

    Guau (Wow) as we say here in Cuba. This is an amazing take on things and makes me wonder: do people who travel think more on place in general? Or is it a writerly thing? Or simply a human thing?

    You have given me much food for thought David, which wasn’t what I was looking for since Im already a glutton for this “place” place, In fact, I’ve just written on it for my blog Here is Havana (this same post was submitted to the Latin American Bloggers ebook which I think you’re involved in?)

    Beware readers: I think Im “guilty” of at least a dozen of the above in this one shore post!

    • http://matadortravel.com/travel-community/david-miller David Miller

      connegro,

      yo–thanks for the buenas palabras.

      somehow i missed this comment the first time around.

      as far as how ppl look at place: i think it’s a human thing, but something which cannot be taken out of one’s cultural context. americans ‘tend to’ look at place with certain patterns, while argentinos look at place with other patterns.

      it’s not a ‘writerly thing’ necessarily . . .being perspicacious in and of itself depends more on the level to which someone can clear his/her mind and just observe.

      i think the writing element is more of a disease of some kind (or perhaps a remedy to one’s neurosis) — this need to get words down, to get one’s views clear to him or herself, and in this way making a record of his / her life / imagination.

      the latin america travel ebook – yes – submitted a story to this as well. ironically it was a piece which conveyed a moment in time where i was fully in the ‘as terrain’ way of looking at place .. . arriving at night in la ticla mexico which was full of federales and (so ppl said) banditos, but you’re not afraid of shit because the waves are headhigh and peeling in the moonlight.

      i say ironically b/c i’m not sure i’m still ‘there’ now as far as looking at place this way.

      but maybe.

  • Wes G

    An interesting postmodern observation David… I studied in Madrid, Spain for the past semester. I noticed the difference between American and Spanish perceptions in various circumstances. While I have no formal research methodology or credentials (other than personal observation) backing this analysis, I’ll attempt to provide one in the following example.
    I’ve noticed that if you cut in the “queue” or “line” (of course another biased and cultural term in itself) or push someone when trying to move ahead, Spaniards are not offended. Many did so to me. If I did this in my hometown Austin, I think I would provoke a volatile reaction from people. Generally speaking, there seems to be an understood idea of space. When walking or moving ahead, it’s solicited that one say “excuse me” or apologize for the intrusion.
    There were many other differences I noted, but I found it interesting how culture influences and triggers emotional responses in the most tacit elements of life. Who would think that a mere line of people or way of walking in a crowd could govern so much response? It reminds us that in order to truly understand another culture, we must analyze in the mundane, day-to-day elements to effectively do so.

    • http://matadortravel.com/travel-community/david-miller David Miller

      thanks for the comments wes.

      i really liked this sentence: ‘It reminds us that in order to truly understand another culture, we must analyze in the mundane, day-to-day elements to effectively do so.’

      i feel like those day-to-day elements, that reality ppl experience at ground level–is the point of entry for learning about place, and you could also extend that to self.

      when ppl lose focus of that (start ‘falling into’ the ways of looking at place listed above) it seems hard – at least to my way of thinking – to progress.

      i question though, ever being able to ‘truly ‘understand’ (in the sense of comprehend) another culture. i wasn’t sure in what sense you were using this phrase.

      it could be another way of looking at place though [and one i've been 'guilty of' - (and why do we keep ascribing 'guilt' to these things .. .why that particular expression?] – looking at place as ‘an expat who now understands the local culture.’

      here’s an example: i’ve lived in argentina going on 3 years now, and i recognize how most people here (a) expect things [cars, government, furniture, electronics, clothes, footwear] as well as people NOT to work, not to be dependable, and (b) when they do, in fact, break or fail or don’t show up, are unbelievably eloquent in explaining how and why they didn’t work and whose fault it was.

      i recognize this and in some ways even ‘appreciate’ it, but at the same time i’m not sure i could ever ‘truly understand’ it as i didn’t have the cultural preparation / upbringing for it.

      [for some reason the idea of ppl converting to judiasm occurs to me. like someone could ask--so you're saying that someone who didn't have the upbringing / cultural preparation for being a jew but who converts later, is not a real heeb?

      which i guess i believe to be true...no, you can't be a 'jew' unless you're born a jew. . .you're a 'person who converted to judiasm'. . .

      it would be like saying you could become an arapahoe indian or 'truly understand' their culture . . .

      some things you just have to be born into i guess]

      damn.

  • Ravi

    This is interesting! Whenever I travel, I will be anxious about my state of mind when I am there – because I know from experience, that is exactly what determines my experience of traveling in the first place, either positive or neutral. Now, after reading this post, I know for sure. Now I have the terms to identify and describe the thought process, thanks to you.

    But you didn’t discuss about what is optimal thought for optimal experience. Perhaps that’s an individual choice/default perceptions, but what are your thoughts on that?

    • http://matadortravel.com/travel-community/david-miller David Miller

      thanks for the comments ravi.

      i feel unable to answer what an ‘optimal thought for optimal experience’ would be, except for myself.

  • Mary Rochelle

    When reading this article, I can’t help but think of this poem: http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/15746

    (Section V is my favorite.)

    Was the similar title intentional?

Humor →

“I feel like…the back of my head…is missing,” my boyfriend said.

Narrative →

Robert Hirschfield reflects on Poets House and how we seek quiet places.

 

16 different reasons why people travel.

Narrative →

Brandon Scott Gorrell lists the main facets of the ‘typical traveler conversation’...

Photo + Video + Film →

#8: touron - This 'not-me' word tells you that the tourist you see is (psst!) actually a...

Writing →

For all the aspiring and working travel writers out there: our friends over at BootsnAll...

Writing →

They can be spun out of even the most unexpected moments, thoughts and connections in our...

Writing →

Check out the winners and runners up in this year's Narrative Travel Writing Contest from...

Volunteer + Work →

I truly believe journalism is a battle of attrition.

Music + Events →

The good bloggers over at Frommers would like to remind all of us aspiring travel writer...