David Miller attempts to mash up the mythology of Facebook’s founder Mark Zuckerman with a writer’s ethic of transparency and / or motivations.

Photo: Max-B

Happy Monday, gente.

While working this weekend I tried to ignore the headline “Movie Reveals Seamy Life of Facebook Boss” but eventually caved.

The story was about an upcoming movie based on Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, and focused on the “seamy” depictions of him “receiving sex in bars, [while his business partner] Parker runs the business.”

What I love about this story, not the actual piece or the movie, but the events / characters they’re describing – is that regardless of what facts are true, part of what people are going to remember about Facebook, the mythology they’re going to create around it (maybe) is that it started with a kid getting dumped and looking for some kind of (most likely sexual) payback.

Which is a cliche, but also makes good movie material because (a) cliches are accepted / expected when there is a core element of “celebrity,” and (b) the image of the protagonist as “tarnished hero” combined with his youth allows the audience to (1) vicariously experience “naughtiness” while (2) still receiving a “payoff” vis-a-vis the hero’s redemption and “coming to terms with” / overcoming his flaws.*

Either way I doubt I’ll watch this movie.

_____

*I’m not sure about this, but it seems reasonable.
Backstory

More than anything, the article made me think about how everyone has a backstory and key events in his / her life, and how these key events impel people (or not) to do different things, make different choices. This seems especially relevant for writers and journalists, but it’s rare to ever learn about these events unless the writer or journo becomes famous / a good interview subject.

Still, how would it change the way we read something from an author if we knew the backstory in his / her life? Or for that matter, the immediate context?

For example, what if there were a kind of disclaimer at the beginning of a “flighty” piece on “20 things I wish I’d known about dating when I was 20″ that said: “I realize the tone of this piece is fluffy, but I had to write it on deadline and the truth is, this was hard for me because I have abandonment issues.”

When the context of writing is a will towards transparency, an act of moving upstream (“Man is a river whose source is hidden.” — Emerson) I feel like almost anything–a user’s profile on Facebook, a “how-to” on ramp-building written by a 15 yr. old skateboarder, a recipe for pumpkin bread–can have “literary value.”

I believe too that this is different than the literary movement ofconfessionalism, although it seems equally facile to dismiss / criticize it with the same argument, which is (paraphrasing from Robert Bly) that it tends to shift one’s attention away from the “suffering of others.”

You could say too that (especially in America), we’re already self-absorbed enough as it is, Facebook perhaps being the greatest emblem and enabler of self-absorption ever created.

But for me really it all comes down to style, to the way the “user” uses his / her account, the way the blogger uses his / her blog.

Facebook “Exodus”

Which brings me to the last point of today’s mashup, the “revolt” against Facebook planned at the end of this month. I’m not sure how to feel about this exactly. It doesn’t seem “heroic” to quit your Facebook account.

The main emotion I felt when reading about this story (and also typing about it right now) is a kind of general disgust at (and yet strangely, empathy with) the editor / writer who chose the word “exodus” to describe people just clicking some account options on their computers.

I wonder how Mark Zuckerman feels about it. I read in the article that he’d had to curtail his birthday celebration in the Caribbean for “crisis meetings.”

But damn, even as I type that sentence I’m already imaging it as a movie scene. Perhaps there would be a parallel montage, jump-cuts between satisfied-looking Facebook users deleting their accounts and a pissed-off-looking Zuckerman staring out the window of a private jet flying back to Facebook Headquarters.

I think the most important question then: What would be the soundtrack be?

Community Connection

Are you going to participate in the Facebook “revolt”?

How do you feel about writers revealing their motivations? Does that kill the story or add to it or neither / both?

Please share you comments below.

 
 

About The Author

David Miller

David Miller is senior editor of Matador (winner of 2010 and 2011 Lowell Thomas awards for travel journalism), and BETA magazine. After living for the last two years in Patagonia, Argentina, he is returning with his wife and two young children to the Southern US. Follow him @dahveed_miller.

  • http://joshywashington.wordpress.com joshywashington

    yeah. the new “exodus” is a click and a smirk not thousands ambling through desert to wilderness.

    In the absence of myth we make our mundane mythical, we give power to our pretension and self absorption through the new hero’s story, which unfolds through facebook account deletion and the subsequent twitter rants.

    who would see this movie?
    Facebook : 3D…god help us

  • Scott

    I’m one of those on the Facebook-fence . . . have been straddling it for a while, am getting a little uncomfortable . . . will decide soon.

    Regarding the “mythology” surrounding Zuckerman and FB: should there be an exodus of any kind, it wouldn’t be the first time in the history of the world that mythology has prompted an Exodus.

    For me it (my decision to leave FB or not) gets down to this: so many virtual-options out there; It’s less for me about how I use my account, as how someone else does.

  • http://www.Travel-Writers-Exchange.com Travel-Writers-Exchange.com

    Yep, everyone has skeletons in their closet. Some may have a lot of while others have a few. The backstory of an author could work in favor or against them. It depends on how “sensationalized” the information is. Most Americans love sensationalism — look at our television shows and media outlets.

    Revealing your motivations could backfire on you, work for you, or do nothing at all. It’s a matter of perception. If the motivations of an author are highly unethical then it could backfire on you because Americans are getting fed up with unethical behavior by people. On the flip side, if your motivations are used for the common good, it could propel you to new heights. Then again, an authors motivations could be a “yawn” that it won’t affect them either way.

    Many people will participate in the Facebook revolt and it will make the news. We’ll have to wait and see how much damage the movie really does to Facebook and it’s founders.

  • http://the-things-i.blogspot.com Jared Krauss

    Forget everything else (not that it wasn’t good writing), my favorite part of this piece is, “I think the most important question then: What would be the soundtrack be?” I think this is where you (as a person and writer) really shines through and it made me smile.

Social Media →

Alice Driver finally comes to terms with Facebook's strong foothold in her life.

Family + Kids →

Power blogger "B" of STFU parents gives Facebook oversharers a little talking to.
by B.
34

 

Yes, it's true, Facebook has rolled out a new ad incentive program that will effectively...

Social Media →

Diaspora's immediate popularity is already proving a threat to Facebook.

 

This Monday we mash up crowdsourcing, the public domain "manifesto," a call for the...

 

In this new series we look at publications, technologies, and opportunities writers,...

World Events →

When a multimillionaire Olympian burns through half your stash in one bong-load, maybe...