As an aside. They just checked the Antarctic Ice. The models were “wrong again” (no surprise there). The water is not warming under the ice and the ice is “not” melting.

http://fimbul.npolar.no/en/news/current/Nye_data.html

Global Warming is definitely Man Made – by the scientists who created the models to show something that cannot be backed up by actual data.

Oh well another inconvenient truthful comment which you will make disappear.

140 luxury private jets were used to fly deep pockets to Copenhagen. PM of Britain took a 127 passenger jet to take him and 20 assistants to Copenhagen. Same day Prince Charles took a seperate private luxury jet to Copenhagen. I guess the dozen or so commercial flights going to Copenhagen that very same day were for the little tax payers. NO concern about massive CO2 emissions and Global Warming..

The Airport in Copenhagen ran out os space to park the Luxury jets. Deep pockets were let out in Copenhagen while Luxury jet were then flown to Norway to park. Heck with Global Warming.

Yes the Global Warming Theory is very profitable – for some. The problem is that the majority of little people will end up filling the deep pockets of the few. Why else spend so much money going to Copenhagen. No one ever asks that question.

THere are many reasons why the glacier you visited is melting. Could be a cyclicl phase it goes thru – another comments seems to indicate that. Your brief stay visiting the Glacier did not warrant implying that the glacier is melting because of Global Warming. But then fear mongering usually has little basis in fact. Too much trouble to let inconvenient facts get in the way

Super photos and congrats on your trip.

Glaciers contract and expand depending on the season. The glacier you visited was contracting, at the time of your visit. You claim that the cause of the glacial contraction can be explained by the Global Warming Theory. I contend that you could be correct, but then you could just as likely be incorrect Were other factors even considered? I believe that that there is currently an el-nino in the ocean off Chile. How has the glacier behaved during time of past el-ninos?

Visiting someplace for a few days does not begin to offer you enough insight to claim that the glaciers melting can be explained by the Global Warming Theory. Another comment posted by Patricio Perez seems to confirm this.

ScienceDaily (Dec. 31, 2009) — Most of the carbon dioxide emitted by human activity does not remain in the atmosphere, but is instead absorbed by the oceans and terrestrial ecosystems. In fact, only about 45 percent of emitted carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere.

However, some studies have suggested that the ability of oceans and plants to absorb carbon dioxide recently may have begun to decline and that the airborne fraction of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions is therefore beginning to increase.

Many climate models also assume that the airborne fraction will increase. Because understanding of the airborne fraction of carbon dioxide is important for predicting future climate change, it is essential to have accurate knowledge of whether that fraction is changing or will change as emissions increase.

To assess whether the airborne fraction is indeed increasing, Wolfgang Knorr of the Department of Earth Sciences at the University of Bristol reanalyzed available atmospheric carbon dioxide and emissions data since 1850 and considers the uncertainties in the data.

In contradiction to some recent studies, he finds that the airborne fraction of carbon dioxide has not increased either during the past 150 years or during the most recent five decades.

The research is published in Geophysical Research Letters.

Journal Reference:

1. Knorr, W. Is the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO2 emissions increasing? Geophysical Research Letters, 2009; 36 (21): L21710 DOI: 10.1029/2009GL040613

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091230184221.htm

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1242011/DAVID-ROSE-The-mini-ice-age-starts-here.html

Their study into the impact of solar radiation on Alpine glaciers made the “surprising discovery” that in the 1940s, and especially summer 1947, the ice floes lost the most ice since measurements begin 95 years ago, according to Zurich’s Federal Institute of Technology (ETHZ).

Yet, average temperatures have been rising in the past two decades and scientists have said glacier melt is accelerating at unprecedented levels under the impact of climate change.

“The surprising thing is that this paradox can be explained relatively easily with radiation,” said one the ETHZ researchers, Matthias Huss, in the university’s online review.

“This should not lead people to conclude that the current period of global warming is not really as big of a problem for the glaciers as previously assumed,” he added.

The researchers found from historic data on three Swiss glaciers, as well as radiation recordings from the eastern Alpine town of Davos, that the level of sunshine in the 1940s was eight percent higher than average and significantly higher than now.

As a result, snow and ice melted by about four percent.

A phase of less sunshine — global dimming — from the 1950s to 1980s also corresponded with the advance in the snout of glaciers.

However, the ETHZ scientists said they also found that “temperature-based opposing mechanisms” came into play about 30 years ago and have been sustained.

The study published in the peer reviewed journal “Geophysical Research Letters” is part of broader reseach into the impact of climate change on the Alps and the role of solar radiation in climate models.

Studies have shown that solar radiation can vary substantially due to cloud cover and aerosols — particles and gases — in the atmosphere.

http://www.physorg.com/news180024364.html