We must learn to take realistic action towards change and let go of any unproductive guilt for having what we have.

Resist the urge.

When I came home after my first significant travels, my experience matched that worn-out definition that most call “re-entry culture shock.”

I felt disappointed at how uninterested my friends and family seemed towards my trip. I felt betrayed at how quickly my life-altering experience seemed to slip away.

Years later on another trip, I stepped off the plane in West Africa, a more hardened traveler.

Not this time, I thought confidently, as Africa instantly swallowed me up in its colour and life so indescribably different from that of the West. I would know how to keep myself together this time; to deal with the conflicted feelings of “re-entry” when the time came.

After four months in Benin and Ghana, hitting Cairo and Zurich on my way home weaned me away from the African reality back towards full Western industrial comforts. By the time I arrived in Montreal, not even the fluorescent supermarkets and sparkling bathrooms seemed unexpected.

It turned out that I had matured since that first trip back in the day – I felt a bit of disappointment, but mostly it just felt great to be home after a great trip.

I had learned much and was more motivated to change the world than ever.

The Urge To Spend

What happened next changed the very understanding of myself. I became excited about fashion

At home I had eagerly tossed my traveling clothes in the donation bag and set out to buy a few staple items like a sweater and jeans.

I didn’t feel the need for more – after all, I had always been the “thrift-store queen” among friends, making do with about a third of the wardrobe burdened on others.

What’s more, Africa had taught me a lot about needs. I felt happy to ditch my well-worn threads, and committed myself to becoming even more scrupulous about making the distinction between “necessary” and “unnecessary” clothing items.

What happened next changed the very understanding of myself.

I became excited about fashion; even more than my early high school years, which was the last time I felt aimlessly “shopping” was a viable past-time. After the jeans and sweater I realized I didn’t own dress pants, and that had to be remedied. I threw in some new summer t-shirts as well.

A friend opened a designer consignment store, and I quickly dropped $250 in a little over a week. Then it was a new $100 bikini, a belt, a summer dress, a designer jacket, all of it purchased new at, horror of horrors, the mall.

I was buying something almost every day. And the line between what I “needed” and didn’t was getting hazier.

The Trend Continues

Photo by fafoutis

What was worse than the gratuitous purchasing was the attitude I seemed to have adopted towards it: after a couple hours of working on a paper for school, at break time I’d excitedly log on to shoe website and browse for half an hour.

I would casually add things to my cart with little or no intention of buying them; just for the sake of imagining having those clogs or these sandals.

While shopping centers had saddened me immediately after my trip (I had vowed to never let myself slip into that consumer-crazed mindset), two weeks later, I barely resisted the urge to stop by the mall on my way home from the library.

I felt a lack of control over my behaviour and unease at how I didn’t recognize this person.

“Don’t worry about it,” my mother would say, “you’ve spent so many years shopping at Value Village, I think buying some new things evens it out, don’t you?”

Getting Rid Of Stuff

Coming home I knew it would not be possible to live with African simplicity in western society. I had not, however, expected to fall prey to the common western problem of wanting things just because they were there, or more importantly, buying things just because I could.

How could I walk into the store and buy a $130 dress, when that same amount of money would pay for six kids to go to school for a year in Benin?

Having momentarily forgotten the swollen abundance of available products, and the general “if you’ve got the money, you deserve to buy it” western attitude, I was suddenly overcome by the distorted value our society places on having stuff.

For me “that stuff” just happened to be clothing. Friends and family congratulated me repeatedly on getting good deals or good purchases, but inside it all felt wrong.

Moreover, in Africa I had seen it’s possible to live with less than we could possibly imagine.

How could I walk into the store and buy a $130 dress, when that same amount of money would pay for six kids to go to school for a year in Benin? How could justify this, after seeing how my fellow human beings were living, in squalor or filth, and poverty?

How could I spend hours sifting through shoes online when I could use my time and brains to change things, to help those with less, to learn more about what forces had given me so much and they had so little?

Enough Is Enough

One night at dinner it almost became too much for me. I suddenly stopped short of putting a luscious spoonful of rosemary lentil soup with feta cheese in my red wine-stained mouth.

What were my friends in Benin eating for dinner tonight?

I have since learned that this is a struggle that many other travelers returning from developing countries have experienced. Once we know with how little it takes to live, how can we apply these lessons to our lives at home?

We must learn to consume in a way that does not perpetuate economic inequity, while acknowledging the fact that we live in the West and therefore must live within a reasonable western standard.

The challenge for all of us is to find a space where we can balance these two objectives. Where we can take realistic action towards change and let go of any unproductive guilt for having what we have.

The outcome of my somewhat unorthodox “re-entry shock” is sure: it caused me to think.

I re-evaluated my level of self-awareness and became committed to testing out ways to find that balance for myself. This is the real magic of travel: that it finds ways to keep teaching you long after you have come home.

It ensures that you’ll continue to question your ways and the ways of the world, and you’ll try to come to terms with your place in it, even if you never set foot on foreign soil again.

What do you think of the consumerist urge? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Culture + Religion
 

About The Author

Erin Moores

Erin Moores is a global education and French student at the University of Waterloo, but in real life she is a traveler, writer, foodie, wilderness lover, francophile, and international community service program leader. Check out her blog Goals for Summer 62

More By This Author

view all →
  • http://www.matadorpulse.com Eva

    I really enjoyed your homecoming story, Erin, and the general sentiment behind it, but I find these generalizations really troubling:

    “the common western problem of wanting things just because they were there, or more importantly, buying things just because I could”

    “the general “if you’ve got the money, you deserve to buy it” western attitude”

    So often here on BNT, I find myself in agreement with the broader point of someone’s article, and yet deeply offended and disappointed by some of the ways they go about making it. (See: Christmas Compassion, for example.)

    Western society’s not perfect – far from it. But it’s not a one-dimensional pit of greed and entitlement, either. I think any call for change needs to be accompanied by a realization that we are talking about real people and real lives, here, and just because someone owns a lot of shoes doesn’t mean they don’t have feelings, and a life beyond their closet.

    Every time I read a throw-away comment about ‘typical 9-5 slaves’ and their need for greater and greater purchasing power, I think how hurt my friends who live those lives would be if they read it. How unfair, superficial and simplistic an assessment of their lives they would think it was.

    So here’s a thought: next time we find ourselves about to make a generalization about the evils of Western society, let’s think about our friends and family members who participate in that society in a more ‘normal’ way, and ask ourselves: Can so-and-so’s entire life actually be reduced to these few words?

    There’s no question things need to change. But contempt, judgment and cartoonish stereotypes won’t get us anywhere.

    (Sorry, Erin, I’m going well beyond the bounds of your article here and addressing myself to the whole BNT community – hope you don’t mind!)

  • http://www.ianmack.com Ian MacKenzie

    Thanks for your comment Eva. Obviously this is an issue that has come up a few times in the past. I agree that it gets us no where to paint all us ‘Westerners’ with a single brush, but I thought Erin did an excellent job of applying what she learned from other cultures to her own circumstance.

    After all, there’s absolutely no denying that we live in a “consumerist” society. It’s not an exaggeration to say that we are bombarded every day at almost every turn with mental pressure to buy, buy, buy. Not just in advertising, but woven into television shows, magazines, and movies, to the point where it’s impossible to separate anymore.

    On BNT I’ve tried to publish articles (like Erin’s) that focus more on the issue, rather than putting down any particular person. By association, certainly some people might take offense, but it’s only because they recognize aspects of “vapid consumerism” in themselves. I know I’m certainly not immune.

  • http://www.rucksackwanderer.com/ Tim Patterson

    Well-written, thoughtful article Erin.

    Eva, usually I see your points and agree with you when we step the bounds – I remember in particular one comment where you wrote about how you feel like those who play up the tourist / traveler distinction are dissing your grandma – that one hit home.

    But this article didn’t seem offensive to me in the slightest. The generalizations Erin makes about Western consumer culture are pretty standard, uncontroversial observations.

    There is a pervasive sense of consumer entitlement in our society. I’m not sure why anyone would be offended by this article, especially because Erin cheerfully includes herself in the consumer category.

    As always though, I appreciate your thoughts and hope we can continue the discussion.

    -TP

  • http://www.matadorpulse.com Eva

    Hey guys,

    I guess I didn’t make a clear enough distinction between Erin’s article (which I enjoyed) and a general trend (that I don’t enjoy). It’s the trend that the bulk of my comment was aimed at – those two lines in this article reminded me of it, so I took the opportunity to detour a little.

    Here’s why I objected specifically to this article: I don’t think Erin exhibited “contempt” or “judgment” here (to use two of the 3 terms I dropped before), but as for the “cartoonish stereotypes” – I always have, and always will, have a problem with broad statements about western greed and consumerism, especially when juxtaposed with equally broad statements about “the other” (be it Africa, Asia, or whatever) and its simpler, morally superior civilization. I think we all need to be very careful to avoid those sorts of generalizations, for a whole array of reasons. Anytime I see a one-sided and negative depiction of “the west” I tend to object. That was my only issue with Erin’s article, and since it was a passing reference it’s a relatively small quibble.

    To continue the broader discussion!

    Ian wrote: “It’s not an exaggeration to say that we are bombarded every day at almost every turn with mental pressure to buy, buy, buy.”

    True. But what bothers me is the assumption that we have no power or free will to resist, to make choices. I don’t mean just the power to choose not to buy (although that exists, too) – I mean the choice *to* buy. When I buy a new pair of shoes or a DVD box set, it’s not because I have a compulsive need to cave in and buy something, anything. I’m not “wanting things just because they were there” – I’m making a decision that whatever the object is means something to me, for whatever reason, and that it’s worth what I’m going to be paying for it. I’m not just a credit-card-swiping drone when I shop – and that’s what I mean when I talk about my friends and family. Yes, they might work 9-5 cubicle jobs, watch several hours of TV each week, own cars and homes in the suburbs, and go clothes shopping on a semi-regular basis – but they also read the newspaper, recycle, coach children’s sports, vote Green, and whatever else. They make choices every day – they aren’t just slaves to a system. Most of them even *like* their jobs and their houses.

    I guess my point is, until we acknowledge that we are all making choices, rather than writing people off as “vapid” automatons, it’s going to be very difficult to get a dialogue going about starting to make different choices.

  • Jenn B.

    Hi all,
    Thanks, Erin, for the article, and Eva, thanks for your response.
    I studied consumerism for my Masters thesis, and I did see some huge generalizations being made about consumption. And yes, it always seemed like consumers were characterized as unfufilled 9-5ing morons suckered by advertizing, or self-actualizing rebellious individuals that could either (a) see through the scam and get all “AdBusters” on it, or (b) influence a whole slew of hip corporations, a la Target and Apple.
    The thing is that consumer products are not just evil. I mean, you can “consume” a flat screen TV on a credit card, or you can “consume” a guitar, a new book, or a gift for a loved one. They also help us find our affinity groups- I am more likely to have stuff in common with someone carrying a Sigg or a Nalgene water bottle than someone carrying a plastic one.
    So just as the cartoon consumer doesn’t exist, neither does the cartoon consumer good.

  • http://www.rucksackwanderer.com/ Tim Patterson

    Great discussion, thanks Eva and Jenn for the thoughts, and I encourage everyone to check out this forum discussion on economic slowdown:

    Economic Crisis

    The global economy is not a simple beast, and generalizations are always fraught, but personally I have no problem making a value judgment about the type of consumerism prevalent in “The West” – and, increasingly, among the elite of the East and the South and everywhere else under the sun.

    Throw-away consumerism is a massive problem – owning 50 pairs of shoes or flying to Las Vegas for a round of golf is harmful, the moral equivalent of pissing in the communal reservoir.

    The crucial caveat is that shoe shoppers and desert golfers are not immoral, or bad people. It is their actions that are harmful. As a writer, one of my missions is to drive that point home, and advocate a simple, sustainable, healthy, empathetic lifestyle.

    The point isn’t to offend people – which never helps with change – it’s to start a discussion, and work to build a critical mass of people who decide clean water is more important than a new TV – or (gasp!) a week-long honeymoon in Bali.

    -TP

  • Daniel Harbecke

    What I took away from Erin’s article is that there’s a lot of materialism (but not all of it) in the West (but not everyone), and a great deal (though not all) of it is thoughtless (yet not completely).

    It’s not about all 9-5ers, it’s about the 9-5ers who never wake up. I’ve got friends in both the awake and asleep columns, and I feel sorry as hell for the ones in full robotic trudge. Erin’s article didn’t offend me in the least.

    Eva, I’ve read enough of your work and replies to see where you’re coming from. You don’t like people being lumped together and branded. You don’t like people being made into something less than they are. You don’t like stereotyping or judgmentalism or denegrating. I get it. It’s laudable. Don’t stop. People need heroes and public defenders and so on.

    But for Christ’s sake!
    - America’s full of thoughtful people, but SOMEbody voted for Bush.
    - We’ve got a great literacy rate, but SOMEbody’s not reading the papers.
    - People have wonderful taste in art, but SOMEbody’s watching “Full House” reruns on Channel 57.
    - This is a remarkably tolerant place to live, but SOMEbody’s standing around with a “God Hates Fags” sign.

    Can’t someone write an article that says “gee, something stinks” without a defensive “what’s wrong with America?” response? If I belly up to the bar and say “Western society sucks,” of course it’s a generalization! Let it go! But on the other hand, just MAYBE I have a point.

    I agree with this article. After I came back home I had little desire to be in on the latest, and got by with much less than before. It was wonderful. Do I hate people who aren’t like me? No, but I have no wish to live like they do, feel frustrated if they don’t see where I’m coming from, and would rather hang with those who do! I’m not better, they’re not worse, but we ain’t the same!

    I’m not trying to offend anyone with the remarks I make – and Eva, I much prefer to be on your good side. But I have to disagree with Tim. Offending people – even intentionally – isn’t a crime, and just because someone’s thin-skinned doesn’t mean everyone else has to kiss their backside. Some very fine things have come out of being selectively offensive and I vastly prefer it to the complacent, shoot-up-with-happy that 100% of the entirety of everyone in all of America is party to.

    Right on, Erin. “Let’s put our heads together and start our own country up…”

  • http://www.matadorpulse.com Eva

    Tim and Daniel, I’m pretty fried and probably not up to the task of continuing this great discussion right now, but wanted to check in since I won’t be able to reply again until sometime Saturday.

    I think on the “offending people” thing I may have laid down a red herring. I don’t mean we shouldn’t say these things because someone might get their feelings hurt (at least, not just that) – I just mean I think we should always (myself included! guilty at times, I’m sure) take a moment to apply our statements to individuals, and see if they stick. Yes, people get offended because they’re thin-skinned or defensive – but sometimes they also get offended because you (the proverbial you, not any of you yous in particular) are wrong about them, or at least only partially right. And that response – if you imagine that individual being incensed by your statement – can be a warning to you that your argument lacks nuance.

    Daniel, you’re completely right on all your points. (And I’m guilty on the Full House re-runs…) But think of Wainanga’s classic, “How To Write About Africa”. I might just as well say, yeah, okay, but there ARE plenty of swollen-bellied children with flies on their eyes! Or whatever other stereotypes he takes down in there. I could turn this around and say, “If I belly up to the bar and say “Africa’s a mess,” of course it’s a generalization! Let it go!”

    I don’t raise these objections purely to defend Western society (although I think it gets no credit these days for its many, many positives). I would raise them for any culture being stereotyped so cavalierly (assuming I know enough about it to recognize that it’s happening), because I don’t think things need to be simplified to that extent in order for us to have a productive discussion. There’s always room for nuance.

    Ok. This is turning into more than a check-in. Not even sure if I’m making sense. I’ll stop now.

  • http://www.rucksackwanderer.com/ Tim Patterson

    You are making sense, Eva, thanks! The world is a complicated place, that’s for darn sure, and maybe the wisest traveler only listens.

  • Erin

    Hey people!
    Wow, this was my first BNT article and I have to say I am very honoured that people felt strongly enough to comment on it! Sweet!

    What is interesting about all this is how the “generalizations” about Western culture came about in this article. When I first wrote it, I didn’t include anything about WHY I came down with this sudden shopaholic-style problem, because it seemed complex to me, perhaps too complex to get into in the article. However, Ian provoked me by asking me to include something on that subject, a bit that would answer the questions related to the reason behind my somewhat compulsive buying. What motivates people to consume, in the end? Why do we buy things outside of what we actually need?

    So I thought more about the factors that contribute to our buying habits as westerners, which are many and complex. The idea of “deserving” the stuff that we buy kept popping back up as I went through the reasons. I truly believe that a great many of us believe that the money we have earned makes us DESERVING of what we buy with it. Don’t YOU think that the money you’ve earned is yours to do with it what you please? And haven’t you ever had someone rationalize to you, when you splurged and bought that great new jacket, new stereo, whatever: “Well, we all deserve a little treat once in awhile.” Or whatever version of that you want. My whole trip to Africa, for example — yes I did volunteer, but it went because it was MY personal dream, and I felt wholly deserving of spending those thousands of dollars that I saved up on a 5-month trip to Africa. Why do we think this way?
    it truly is “if you have the money, you deserve to buy it.” I don’t like this part of western culture, partly because we don’t think critically about it often enough.

    Of course not everybody thinks this way. But it’s certainly a deeply entrenched, almost subconscious theme in our society. The contrast would be a culture that views things more communally — some African cultures are examples — where what’s mine is yours, what’s his is theirs, and you’ll “loan” your cousin all the money you have without even asking why he needs it. This system is not without its pros and cons, just like the western one has pros and cons as well.

    I try not to think ever of the world as an “us/them” kind of place. However, it’s a diverse world, and acknowledging that means recognizing that yes there are distinct cultures within the human race that have discrete worldviews, customs, habits, survival techniques. I really do think that in the west we buy way too much stuff that we don’t need just because it’s there. And I really believe that our “entitlement” mindset towards what we buy is very real and flawed in terms of living sustainably. So these are the aspects of my article that I find troubling — that these generalizations CAN be accurately made.

    Anyway thanks for reading my article.

  • Erin

    PS
    My friend Heba, who is a journalist, and I wrote a “joint blog entry” on this topic when we were in Egypt together. Based on your comments I think some of you might find it thought-provoking!
    http://www.travelblogger.net/members/mooresie/index.html?action=ViewTravelBlogs&tbid=901&beid=3604&

  • http://www.vickielizabeth.com VickiElizabeth

    Just to throw a few more spices into the pot…
    Is travel not just another form of consumerism?
    It is easy, as regular – or permanent – travellers to distance ourselves from the cliché of the 9-5 office worker and their stereotypical consumer behaviour (whether this person exists or not has been discussed above – I´m not going to go into this on this post!).
    I am including myself in this category, as someone who has lived abroad and travelled for five years. I purchase very little for two reasons: One, because I prefer to spend my money on long or short haul trips, and two, because each time I move on, all my belongings have to be transported along with me.
    But haven´t i just applied the same consumer behaviour to travelling?
    I surely don´t NEED to travel as much as I do. It inspires my writing and paintings, but is not (currently) essential for my work.
    As with many people, I feel the “necessity” to travel, good old itchy feet. But that urge is probably the same that someone else feels while salivating over a pair of $250 wedges. Worse – I regularly used to feed my shopping urges in Charity shops and second hand bookshops. Sadly, second-hand flights are not yet available…
    I adore the traveller lifestyle I lead, but it has only been possible for the masses for a decade or two, at most. Are my purchases any more excusable simply because they are non-material?

  • Elizabeth

    I keep coming back to this article because something about it bugs me. I think VickiElizabeth hit the proverbial nail on the head.

    My experience of university was very different in that I couldn’t afford luxuries like new clothes or to travel. However, I was repeatedly hit with the “logic” that my well-off friends “deserved” to go on vacation for spring break because they “worked so hard”. My friends’ parents deserved vacations more than my self-employed parents because they had the luxury of disposable income and more time off.

    But what about people who go on foreign exchanges? Who work or volunteered abroad? Or who save for years for a “once in a lifetime” trip? Maybe it’s the attitude of entitlement, not the travel itself, that is harmful?

    I’m not sure what to think. I’m just putting the idea out there.

  • http://www.vickielizabeth.com VickiElizabeth

    Elizabeth, I think you´re right that the concept of “deserving” or “earning” or taking for granted is the bigger issue behind all this. I started shopping at those charity shops out of necessity as a student, and fortunately found that they rather suited my tastes! (despite being mortified when my mum took me to charity shops as a child though) I had two jobs while I studied, as well as a student loan. Of course I resented those who were supported entirely by their families… but equally, my parents would have done the same had they been better off.

    Now, happily, I find that my resoucefulness is one of my most useful skills, having turned my hand to everything from translation to illustration and face-painting to make ends meet. And knowing you´ve worked so hard for every penny makes the trip – or the shoes, or the jacket – that bit more special.

    One of my friends was stunned that I could afford to travel for 3 months… the truth is, my entire trip probably cost the same as her two week luxury holiday to Cancún.

    Volunteering was one way I saved money, as well as being able to give something back… the travel equivalent of the charity shop?! Either way, I, like many others have always recognised travel to be something I am lucky to be able to do, and not an entitlement. Hopefully this makes us more respectful travellers or consumers, even of the end result is the same?

  • Erin

    Thanks for your comments VickiElizabeth and Elizabeth…the point about travel being a kind of consumerism is definitely interesting. For me the “consumerism” idea is made up of a lot of things: when you buy a product or service, are you buying it because you need it? Is it something that has been produced and can be consumed in a sustainable and responsible way? Is it something that is brand new or is it made from recycled materials? Is it from a sweatshop or a unionized factory? A local or foreign company, a socially responsible one or not? Are you reusing (buying from a charity shop, for example) or are you buy new again? Have you tried to use all the possible ways you can to minimize the impact your purchase makes on the environment and on negatively affecting the quality of human life? All these things have to contribute to what makes a purchase “good” or “bad,” but often we can find that we can stop right at Number 1: whether or not it’s necessary. A lot of the time we don’t even have to bother answering the other questions, because the answer to Number 1 is “no.”

    That said, travel can so often fit into the “not necessary” category. Even volunteer trips are often unnecessary, unless your act of volunteerism fits into helping out during some kind of localized or global emergency where manpower or your specific skills are truly needed. But you might travel and volunteer to bolster your resume and career skills/options. I think though that if we’re going to put travel into the “possibly not necessary” category, we can also put expensive university and college educations in this cateogory. It always fascinates me how we so unflinchingly nad naturally accept as a society that a post-secondary education is ALWAYS justifiable, even if you spend four years and $40,000 in a BA psych program that you hate and is basically useless on its own.

    Neither education nor travel should ever be labeled as “always” or “never” justifiable, because so much depends on the specific situation. People learn a lot through their education, but sometimes all they learn is that they can’t do 10 shots in 10 minutes without passing out. People learn a lot from traveling, but sometimes all they learn is that they can’t do 10 shots in 10 minutes without passing out. The important point is that the potential to really learn a lot is there — and the potential to learn is just not quite AS there when you look at acts of consumption like buying products like clothing or stereos or whatnot.

    So in conclusion I think you are right, whenever we buy products or services it’s an act of consumerism, whether it’s a jacket, a university degree, or a trip to Nepal. But for things like travel, we can take steps to make our experience more meaningful to us, our communities, and the world, and therefore a “better” kind fo consumerism.

Culture + Religion →

Natalie Grant just made your resolution-making decisions easier.

Culture + Religion →

MatadorU student Hope Nardini sidesteps Quito's backpacker ghetto to check out the rest...

Culture + Religion →

Avrol Looking Horse leads the Lakota Tribe in trying to shift mankind's energy toward...

Culture + Religion →

Blanca loves Chester like a son, and accordingly, me like a daughter in-law. American...

Culture + Religion →

During the season of the dead, Christine Garvin uses ritual to try and understand a bit...

Culture + Religion →

Get your cremains pressed into vinyl. Why be scattered when your family's eardrums could...

Culture + Religion →

When you stop to ask yourself what homeless people spend money on, why not ask yourself...

Culture + Religion →

Check out a different side of New York's museum scene with these 5 recommendations from...

Culture + Religion →

Santiago, Chile: Take a break from the norm and discover the city locals love and...

Recycling →

Continuing to bury our refuse is not a sustainable option. We must scale back our...