Italy is introducing new tourism rules in several popular destinations as part of a broader effort to manage overtourism and protect local communities. On the island of Capri, officials have approved regulations that limit organized tour groups to a maximum of 40 people starting in summer 2026. Guides leading groups larger than 20 must use headsets rather than loudspeakers, and they are no longer allowed to carry the large flags or umbrellas traditionally used to gather visitors. The measures are intended to reduce congestion in the island’s narrow streets and scenic viewpoints, which Euronews reports can receive as many as 50,000 visitors a day, far more than the island’s roughly 13,000 residents.
Photo: BBA Photography /Shutterstock
Three Popular Italian Destinations Just Enacted New Travel Restrictions. That's a Good Thing.
Other Italian destinations are implementing their own restrictions to curb the impact of mass tourism. In Florence, authorities have introduced rules targeting the growth of short-term rentals and large tour groups, including banning key lockboxes used for self-check-in at vacation rentals and prohibiting tour guides from using loudspeakers in the historic center. Meanwhile, a village in the Dolomites has begun charging a fee to access a popular hiking trail and increasing oversight of visitor behavior after heavy tourist traffic damaged local land and infrastructure.
The new restrictions are largely a response to the sheer scale of people — the destinations, and their residents, are overwhelmed. On Capri, for example, the 50,000 visitors per day during peak season puts intense pressure on the narrow streets and transport systems, let alone the public services. In Florence, tourism has rebounded to extremely high levels, with about 16.2 million visitors recorded in 2024, according to Quantumrun, and studies rank the city among places facing “high” levels of tourist overcrowding relative to its size and population. The Dolomites have experienced similar surges in popularity, and the 2026 Winter Olympics and Paralympics certainly aren’t helping that case. The wider region saw around 34 million visitors in 2022, CNN reported, while some individual trails have drawn as many as 8,000 people in a single day.
Given these numbers, many officials and residents argue that new rules are a positive step toward sustainable tourism. In places like Capri, where daily tourist numbers can vastly outnumber locals, or in the Dolomites, where mountainous, wild areas face intense crowds, these policies are increasingly seen as necessary tools to preserve both the visitor experience and the long-term livability of the places people travel to see. As a travel editor and someone who has worked remotely in numerous locations around the globe, I couldn’t agree more.
Why the new Italian travel restrictions are necessary
Photo: Ceri Breeze /Shutterstock
On the surface, travel restrictions and fees seem annoying at best and economically counterproductive at worst. However, they’re often necessary. I spent over five years on the board of advisors for the destination marketing organization (DMO) representing the town where I live – Palisade, Colorado. Our town is small and experiences seasonal tourism that peaks in the summer and fall, and is noticeably less in winter. Most visitors come to experience the surrounding wine country and orchards (our peaches are the sweetest, bar none) as well as bike the iconic Palisade Plunge trail or recreate outdoors in other manners. The town government, chamber of commerce, and outside promoters host a series of large-scale festivals in the summer, ranging from a raucous bluegrass fest to a wine week, and we have a very popular weekly farmer’s market.
Given only that context, it would seem that the more tourism, the better – more money for local restaurants and hotels, more people at the festivals, vendors slinging higher quantities of veggies and fruits. However, Palisade is a small town with just 2,600 residents. We have two hotels and six small restaurants open for dinner. The town can only accommodate about 300 roomnights without bouncing travelers down the road to the adjacent city of Grand Junction. Not only that, but our board received frequent feedback from residents who felt that the town is “taken over” by visitors during the summer and that it’s difficult for them to get a table for dinner or enjoy casual strolls through downtown. Some visitors, they said, behaved drunkenly or inappropriately after spending several hours visiting wineries.
As such, the town enforces a strict limitation on short-term rental permits and voters recently approved a 300 percent increase in lodging tax fees to fund additional law enforcement and fire department personnel at festivals and events. Several rideshare options are available to handle transporting guests between lodging and wineries, including pedicabs and motorized vehicles. The local bike shop, which rents e-bikes for wine touring, advises not just on how to use the bikes but also on how to behave themselves around town.
I am unabashedly pro-tourism. Yet I’m in favor of travel restrictions and fees because they have the ability to weed out bad apples while prioritizing those who visit a place with the right intentions. They also can help local communities more unilaterally benefit from the economic perks of tourism. I led our board’s efforts to collaborate with the Colorado Tourism Office on the “Do Palisade Right” campaign, part of a statewide effort to promote responsible tourism. It’s these enforced limits and educational campaigns that have kept our town not just liveable for residents but enjoyable for visitors.
Without preventative action, it would be all too easy for outside investors to buy up our homes and turn Palisade into an unchecked Airbnb town, or for over-indulged festivalgoers to continue to romp sloppily through our tiny downtown every Saturday night, without being aware of the impact of their actions.
Locations such as the Italian Dolomites or Capri, where tourism numbers trounce what we see in our little corner of Colorado, are wise to listen to the concerns of residents and take swift measures to curb overtourism. Regions of abundant natural beauty such as these can’t be taken for granted, lest they become an Italian version of Cancun’s Hotel Zone. 