Previous Next

I write for a newspaper, says Dan Gardner, in so many words.

When I author, I am relevant and topical. My vocabulary is college-approved, my message fit to modern style. My insight and I share a desk in an office – bastion against the screaming ignorance of the pop mob.

If not for me and the degree in my holster, the tone is felt, come the Visigoths.

Making his rounds for the CanWest News Service, Dan attends a lecture in Ottawa given by the Dalai Lama. Though impressed by his “septuagenarian” (good word!) ability to pack ‘em in like Hanna Montana, Gardner is let down by the lack of sophistication in the Dalai Lama’s message.

“He’s a wonderful old guy, but his words are platitudes on the level of Oprah or Deepak Chopra,” he later writes in his article Non-wisdom from the Dalai Lama

For evidence, he cites various Dalai Lama quotes:

…I believe that the purpose of life is to be happy….
…We all come from our mother’s womb. Therefore we all have the same potential for compassion….
My main commitment is the concept of a happy life… much depends on having peace of mind.

What warrants the ticket price? wonders Dan. This man is supposed to be a fount of profundity; surely he can do better than:

“The concept of war is outdated… first inner disarmament, then outer disarmament.”

Dan returns to his writing desk, locked and loaded by the non-event, fueled by the indignation of missing an episode of Heroes for such empty-headed tripe.

The Meaning of Words

It’s unfair of me to write this way. Mr. Gardner has no doubt earned his position and isn’t necessarily a fan of Heroes nor perhaps a literary cynic. He recognizes the meaning of words, though he astonishingly fails to see what meaning may issue from the person (or desk) who speaks (or writes) them.

Gardner can’t be blamed entirely – no more than my classmate in high school, when she asked the instructor what good geometry was if not used in the “real world.” It was a reasonable though regrettable question, asked about a perceived circularity. What good is geometry?

Mr. Gardner’s job is to see through hype – and in the Dalai Lama’s audience, he saw plenty. He suspects the Dalai Lama’s distinction comes from a cult of personality: “fawning audiences that treat every grunt and guffaw as a shiny pearl dropped from the heavens.”

Excessive adulation isn’t pretty, particularly if you don’t understand the value of the celebrity: why Britney, why Brangelina, why Elvis or other such mythical creatures? What good are they?

“Good” can be a relative thing. The Arabs have a saying: “All sun makes a desert” – too much light makes the baby go blind, or perhaps too many clichés, or speaking too glibly.

But imagine a child who never learns to feed himself because his mother never let him go hungry. Imagine if my classmate wasn’t permitted to ask her question. Imagine if Mr. Gardner didn’t write his myopic poesy what I’d be doing with my time.

A Man of Peace

There must be more to the Dalai Lama than being a burr to the Chinese.

For me, he’s a defender of an endangered, spiritual culture whose homeland was taken by despotism. For me, he’s a man of peace who reaches across borders of nation, politic, religion and status. For me, he’s an imperfect man whose ideas are welcome against the constant blare of aggression and suffering. But this is what I bring with me.

If I demand brilliance or the kiss of destiny every time I break open a fortune cookie, I’d soon hate chow mein. How can I explain to someone why I still bother to read them, if they don’t understand how I value them?

Every experience is prefaced by one’s expectations. The difference between a traveler and one who travels: travelers know travel has nothing to do with where you go, but with how you go.

You can go to Paris and see nothing, if you assume Paris is only a matter of going to Paris. I can go to a party, yet have a miserable time; or be surrounded by wealth and accomplishment and resent every bit of it. The art is to find vehicles for your expression – limiting yourself to inflexible demands will prevent you from ever achieving fluency.

Active or Passive

I wonder how many languages Mr. Gardner is able to communicate his ideas in, how verbose he and his thesaurus must be to express basic truths for pursuing contentment. I wonder if I myself overlook more delicate messages because they don’t make for good television in my culture.

I value his words not for their depth but precisely for their simplicity. I’m not interested in being overwhelmed, but invited.

Back to Britney. Her music isn’t for me. I base this on what I expect it to be; I’m free to do so. Am I wrong? Are her fans? Are they wrong because they like it, or am I wrong for expecting it to be more than it is? Is there, in truth, no gustibus for disputandum?

The Dalai Lama. I don’t demand that everything he says to be meaningful. I don’t consider his every thought a revelation, for he isn’t talking to me alone. Most importantly, where I differ with Mr. Gardner: I don’t believe his words banal because his role is so extraordinary.

I value his words not for their depth but precisely for their simplicity. I’m not interested in being overwhelmed, but invited.

Mr. Gardner expected the Dalai Lama’s lecture to change him and was disappointed.

His experience was passive: he arrived, but went no further. In our entertainment culture, we expect to be carried. It’s no surprise that Gardner confuses simplicity with simplistic, because he only went halfway. He merely attended.

The Most Important Truths

Beyond trite everyday existence is an underlying beauty of commonality, seen only by shedding trade values and recognizing inner meaning.

The most important truths are stripped of their gloss and prose. They’re not always clever, nor worthless for not being clever; they aren’t always fashionable or weighty or erudite.

Their value rests somewhere else, for words find definition in the dictionary, Mr. Gardner – they find meaning in the people who use them.

Every so often, Virginia again wonders aloud if there’s a Santa Claus. With luck, there’s a geometry teacher nearby with an answer why the “real” world is made so much broader by the power to make more of it “real.”

I once met a man who held a door open for me, and I thanked him. He replied, “In Tibet, we believe a word of thanks is a kind of prayer.”

I thought this a lovely sentiment. Not so deep, but lovely.

F. Daniel Harbecke (just call him Daniel, the F’s a family thing) is currently working on “A Philosophy of Travel,” which envisions travel as a metaphor for the meaningful experience of life. Daniel has lived in Europe, South America and Asia and is trying to fund his tony lifestyle in Sweet Home Chicago.

About The Author

F. Daniel Harbecke

F. Daniel Harbecke (just call him Daniel, the F's a family thing) is currently working on "A Philosophy of Travel" which envisions travel as a metaphor for the meaningful experience of life. Daniel has lived in Europe, South America and Asia and is trying to fund his tony lifestyle in Sweet Home Chicago.

  • Joshua Berman

    Very well said, I especially agree with the passive-vs.-active roles of those involved. Thank you for this thoughtful post.

  • Passenger

    This post reveals more than just a one-person perception. If you think about it, we are expecting to be entertained all the time and if it’s not what we are used to – it’s not good.

    As for Mr. Gardner he’s just a tourist, not a traveler. How good of advice can you get from someone who knows a country by watching it through a window?
    Straight to the point, Mr. Harbecke!

  • Kango Suz

    Thank you so much for your thoughtful post about Mr. Gardner’s review of the Dali Lama’s speech. I especially enjoyed your insights into why he doesn’t understand the love that people have for the Dali Lama.

  • http://n/a Emily Hansen

    I believe that Mr. Harbeke has a point here. I spent the entire five years of my degree being forced to read Foucault, and beneath the “sophisticated” intellectual babble, I found some simple truths, which did not require as much complicated language as the whole process entailed.

    The purpose of life IS to be happy, and that’s not an unsophisticated thought, it’s just real- many people think that but how many believe it? Proof that the Big D has an important role to play, besides surviving exhile living to tell, and helping to further the Tibetan cuase. Mr. Gardner could give the guy a break. In our difficult world, people need to be reminded how much simpler life could be.

    Maybe Mr. Gardner won’t buy his book, any maybe some critique of the saccarine-sweet self-help industry would be justified, but picking on the Dalai Llama? Come on!

  • Eva

    I think one of the (many) problems with Gardner’s piece is that he is apparently completely oblivious to the reasons why the Dalai Lama spends his years trekking around the globe and making speeches in arenas. It’s not just because he wants to share his messages (the ones Gardner is criticizing as trite) with people – it also has an awful lot to do with keeping Tibet on people’s minds, and refusing to let the world forget about his country and his people. He is, I’m sure, savvy enough to know that “playing Oprah” as Gardner would have it, is one sure way to make everyone remember the occupation.

    And incidentally, since when was an arena in Indiana an appropriate setting for some deeper discourse? I’m sure the man has more to say – but mass gatherings are hardly the place for complex arguments. Besides, even if we all do know that war is bad and should be avoided (and, uh, evidently we don’t ALL know this), it never hurts to be reminded.

  • Dan

    Great article, Gardner would do well to familarise himself this Buddhist concepts a bit more. Sure you don’t have to be Buddhist to go see the Dalai Lama, and many aren’t, but it will give you a new perspective if you understand where he is coming from. If enlightenment is attainable to most of us and given that we are simple creatures it would make sense that answers will be found in simplicity rather than the confused complex minds of pop intellectuals.

  • Brodnin Wind

    Consider this:

    There are three main forms of teaching in every school of thought. This reality applies to the Gelukpa Order of Buddhism.

    The first is the most general and simplistic, intended for the masses: educated and uneducated. (in this case, it was to this that the Daila Lama was speaking that night in Ottawa).

    The second is reserved for the scholars, those who study thought and attempt to understand inner meaning.

    The third is reserved for the practitioners of esoteric methods; they are those in the process of self-observation and development who have already understood a vast array of ancient knowledge systems concerning the universe and man.

    Personality is what he acquire, essence is what we inherit.

Closing my eyes, I inhaled deeply, allowing my belly to fill with air, then exhaled.
Kick-start your inner travel by breaking these mental barriers.
The ancient ritual of firewalking can teach a person some very important life lessons.
On seeing the Dalai Lama speak in New York.
A spokesman for the President claimed the move was intended to prevent any distractions...
With the goal of inner peace and the charm of a simple monk, what's behind the Dalai...
BNT reader Jennifer Plasha shares her thoughts about the spiritual search, and how life...
While officials play war games, citizens send messages of love.
For years I've been searching the globe from Somalia to Chechnya to Iraq to Afghanistan.
"You can cut this branch but a thousand more will grow."
38 years after it was recorded, an impromptu interview with John Lennon has surfaced as a...
If only political interests could be so harmonized.