THE CAMPAIGN to defeat SOPA (Stop Online Privacy Act), and its sister bill PIPA (Protect Intellectual Property Act), is showing positive results.
Major Internet players like Google, Facebook, and Twitter continue to lobby against the bills. Led by Reddit, sites all over the Web have pledged to go dark this Wednesday, January 18, to protest the measures.
And on Saturday, the White House finally weighed in, raising concerns about the legislation and casting doubt about its passage.
The aim of SOPA/PIPA is to punish websites that violate copyright by posting or sharing protected material. However, the ways in which the bills propose to do this thwart due process and amount to a clear potential for Internet censorship.
SOPA would enable the US State Department and copyright holders to have a website shut down and its advertising revenue and access to financial tools such as Paypal blocked simply by accusing it of violating a copyright — in other words, the site would be guilty until proven innocent, if it got the chance to defend itself at all.
It has also been suggested that “even linking to an offending website can get you taken offline. The definition of copyright infringement would become so loose that simply associating yourself with a site that has been accused of violating IP [intellectual property] is enough to make you guilty, too.”
This shows a fundamental lack of understanding on the part of lawmakers about how the Internet works and how easy it would be for an ‘innocent bystander’ to get burned by SOPA. Indeed, VICE recently reported that Rep. Lamar Smith, author of the bill, was guilty of copyright infringement on his own site.
While the House has delayed a vote on SOPA yet again, thanks in large part to unrelenting pressure from opponents, the Senate is still scheduled to vote on PIPA January 24.